By Greg Nowak. Updated 28 October 2026.
If your team is being asked whether the business appears in AI search, a handful of screenshots will only take you so far. You need a repeatable way to see which pages appear, which subjects they cover, and whether the pattern deserves action.
Google and Bing now provide first-party reporting that makes this easier. The practical challenge is deciding what the numbers justify. An appearance can help you investigate a content opportunity; it cannot, by itself, tell you that AI search generated a customer.
What Google’s AI search report actually measures
Google’s Generative AI performance report records impressions for links shown in AI Overviews and AI Mode, excluding Search Labs experiments. Google says the rollout reached websites worldwide on 31 August 2026. You can examine pages, countries, devices and dates. If the report is missing, insufficient impressions may be the reason.
For businesses with visually distinctive products, check the search-type filter too. Google’s multimodal reporting update separates image-assisted searches, including Lens, Circle to Search on Android, image uploads and Chrome’s image-search action. It applies to both Search results and generative AI performance reporting. A retailer or manufacturer should inspect this view before assuming text queries explain all discovery.
Bing shows citations, with more context around them
Bing’s AI Performance report covers Microsoft Copilot, AI-generated Bing summaries and selected partner integrations. It shows citation totals, average unique cited pages per day, URL-level activity and sampled grounding queries: phrases used to retrieve supporting content. Those retrieval phrases should not be treated as a complete record of users’ original prompts.
A citation count does not establish placement within an answer, ranking or authority. It tells you that content was referenced across the supported experiences.
Bing’s June reporting expansion added Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Compare. Citation Share is the percentage of citations attributed to your site among all citations for the same grounding query. It is observational, rather than a traffic-share or quality score. Use the intent and topic labels to organise an investigation, allowing for broad or imperfect classifications.
New in October: a better starting point for content decisions
On 13 October, Bing introduced Topics Portfolio in beta. Where sufficient data exists, it groups your presence by theme and adds approximate topic citation totals, numbers of cited sites and query counts. Opportunity Queries highlight queries where other sites appear and yours does not, with citation volumes expressed as ranges.
This is useful planning context, with limits. Smaller sites may see few topics or no feature, classifications can be wrong, and opportunities can include competitor-branded queries. Treat the list as candidates to review. A large topic is only commercially interesting if it overlaps with what you sell and the customers you want.
| Reporting view | Useful decision | Avoid concluding |
|---|---|---|
| Google AI impressions | Choose pages and markets to investigate | Exposure produced visits or enquiries |
| Google multimodal filter | Assess image-assisted discovery separately | Text search explains every appearance |
| Bing page citations | Identify repeatedly referenced URLs | Frequently cited means highest authority |
| Bing intent and Citation Share | Review context and relative citation presence | Share equals ranking or revenue |
| Bing Topics Portfolio | Shortlist relevant coverage gaps | Every suggested query deserves new content |
Build a baseline your team can maintain
I would start with a spreadsheet and a defined review routine. Automation becomes worthwhile once the team understands the exports and knows which decisions the report should support.
- Set the scope. Confirm access to the correct website properties. Choose the services, product categories or editorial areas that matter commercially, and compare equal, complete reporting periods.
- Keep the original exports. Save the platform, report name, filters, date range and export date alongside each file. Google uses Pacific Time, generally attributes page data to canonical URLs, and applies a 1,000-row table limit. Property totals and page totals can differ through aggregation. Unavailable values export as zero, so preserve that caveat.
- Reconcile URLs carefully. Keep both the reported URL and a mapped canonical URL. Resolve known redirects and duplicates without merging genuinely different product variants, languages or service pages.
- Keep unlike metrics separate. Give Google impressions and Bing citations their own columns and trends. Adding them into one visibility total creates a number that is difficult to interpret.
- Record changes and ownership. Log content edits, migrations and tracking changes. For agencies, assign an owner to each finding so the monthly report produces agreed work rather than another dashboard to check.
Connect findings to enquiries without inventing attribution
Review visibility alongside landing-page visits, completed enquiries and lead quality, while keeping those measurements distinct. If citations rise and enquiries stay flat, investigate audience relevance, the page’s offer and the route to contact. The two trends alone do not establish what caused the outcome.
For example, a frequently cited guide may answer a useful technical question while giving a potential buyer little help choosing a service. Check whether it explains the next decision, links to an appropriate service page and offers a clear way to ask for help.
When visibility drops, first narrow down the affected platform, pages and period. Then check access, redirects, duplication and outdated information before commissioning a rewrite. Record the proposed explanation, make a focused change and review it against a consistent comparison period.
Make the report useful enough to act on
A useful monthly review should finish with a short list of priorities: what changed, what evidence supports an investigation, who owns it and when to review it again.
If you need help getting there, I can check the reporting setup, reconcile page identities and build a review process your team can maintain. Talk to Greg about your AI search reporting and the decisions you need it to support.
Related on GrN.dk
- Search Console Can See Social Posts—Your Reports Need a New Map
- AI Search Has Reports. Here’s How to Connect Visibility to Revenue
- Google’s 2026 AI Search Guidance: SEO Still Matters, but Reporting Has Changed
Need help with this kind of work?
Talk to Greg about AI search reporting Get in touch with Greg.
Sources
- Google: Generative AI performance report (Search)
- Google: Announcing web multimodal Search performance reporting
- Bing: Introducing AI Performance in Bing Webmaster Tools Public Preview
- Bing: New AI Visibility Insights—Intents, Topics, Citation Share, Compare
- Bing: Introducing Topics Portfolio (Beta) in AI Performance