How to Stop or Remove whoopsie-upload-all on Ubuntu

Illustrated infographic summarizing: Remove whoopsie-upload

By Greg Nowak. Last updated 2026-10-11.

If whoopsie-upload-all is consuming a CPU core, the quickest response is to stop the relevant process. The better response is to understand which part of Ubuntu’s crash-reporting pipeline is running, preserve any evidence you need, and then choose the least disruptive fix.

Ubuntu uses Apport to collect crash information. Whoopsie submits eligible reports to Ubuntu’s error tracker. Despite its name, /usr/share/apport/whoopsie-upload-all is supplied by the apport package on Ubuntu 24.04, while the separate whoopsie package provides the submission daemon and its systemd units. That distinction matters when stopping services or removing packages.

What is whoopsie on Ubuntu?

Whoopsie is Ubuntu's crash-report uploader. When a program crashes, Apport writes a report to /var/crash, and the whoopsie daemon (whoopsie.service) sends it to the Ubuntu Error Tracker at errors.ubuntu.com when error reporting is on. Stopping or removing it is safe. The only loss is that Ubuntu developers stop receiving your crash reports. A busy whoopsie-upload-all usually means a big crash queue, so also look at what keeps crashing.

Confirm what is actually consuming the CPU

Do not start by purging packages. First identify the process, its parent and the installed systemd units:

ps -eo pid,ppid,%cpu,%mem,etime,cmd | grep -E '[w]hoopsie|[a]pport'
systemctl list-unit-files 'whoopsie*' 'apport*'
systemctl status whoopsie.service whoopsie.path apport-autoreport.service --no-pager

Unit names vary between Ubuntu releases, so a “unit not found” message is useful information rather than necessarily an error. Check recent logs and the size of the crash queue as well:

journalctl -u whoopsie.service -u apport-autoreport.service --since '1 hour ago' --no-pager
sudo du -sh /var/crash
sudo ls -lh /var/crash

A large queue or repeated errors may explain the activity, but high CPU can also be a symptom of a particular broken report or package defect. Keep relevant files until you have finished diagnosing the underlying crash. Clearing /var/crash destroys useful evidence and does not correct the application that crashed.

Choose the smallest intervention that solves the problem

Situation Recommended action Trade-off
Immediate production impact Stop the active units Temporary; they may return after reboot or activation
You do not want automatic uploads Use Ubuntu’s diagnostics setting or disable the path/timer units Crash reports remain less useful to Ubuntu maintainers
A unit keeps being reactivated Mask the relevant units Prevents even manual activation until unmasked
The machine must not retain this tooling Simulate, then purge the packages Removes local crash-reporting and support capabilities
A practical decision matrix for handling Ubuntu’s crash-reporting components.

Stop the current upload safely

Use the unit names found during inspection. On systems where all three exist, the immediate stop is:

sudo systemctl stop whoopsie.service whoopsie.path apport-autoreport.service

This stops current activity but does not necessarily prevent a later restart. It is preferable to killing processes repeatedly because systemd can otherwise reactivate them through a path or timer unit.

Disable future reporting without removing packages

On Ubuntu Desktop, the supported user-facing route is under Settings → Privacy & Security, then Diagnostics or Telemetry, depending on the release. Set error reporting to disabled if that matches your organisation’s privacy and support policy.

For a command-line system, inspect /etc/default/apport and change its existing enabled value to 0:

sudoedit /etc/default/apport

Then disable the activation units that are actually installed:

sudo systemctl disable --now whoopsie.path
sudo systemctl disable --now apport-autoreport.path apport-autoreport.timer

If activation continues, masking is the stronger option. Unlike disable, a systemd mask prevents all activation, including manual starts. Apply it deliberately and only to units present on the machine:

sudo systemctl mask --now whoopsie.service whoopsie.path
sudo systemctl mask --now apport-autoreport.service apport-autoreport.path apport-autoreport.timer

Remove Apport and Whoopsie only when policy requires it

The old advice to run systemctl disable apport is incomplete on current Ubuntu releases: there may be no simple apport.service, and path- or timer-activated units can be involved. Likewise, removing only whoopsie does not remove whoopsie-upload-all when that file belongs to apport.

Preview the package impact before making a permanent change:

sudo apt --simulate purge apport whoopsie

Read the proposed removal list. On a managed desktop, server image or support workstation, other tooling may expect Apport to be available. If the simulation matches your intention, proceed with:

sudo apt purge apport whoopsie

apt is sufficient; installing or using aptitude is unnecessary for this task.

Verify the result and keep a rollback path

pgrep -af 'whoopsie|apport'
systemctl --failed
systemctl is-enabled whoopsie.path apport-autoreport.path apport-autoreport.timer

If you masked units, reverse that decision with systemctl unmask. If you removed the packages, reinstall them with sudo apt install apport whoopsie, restore the desired diagnostics setting, and review /etc/default/apport. Package defaults and enabled units can differ by Ubuntu release, so verify the resulting state rather than assuming every unit should be enabled.

If this issue appeared across a fleet or inside a client environment, the valuable work is usually not the one-line removal command. It is finding the recurring crash, agreeing on a reporting policy and applying a reversible configuration consistently. Contact Greg if you want help turning that investigation into a safe operational change.

Related on GrN.dk

Need help with this kind of work?

Get help with your Ubuntu environment Get in touch with Greg.

Sources

Seneste artikler

Når kunden beder om indsigt, kan AI hjælpe med at samle materiale fra WordPress og Microsoft 365. Se, hvordan I holder styr på datakilder, ansvar og kontrol.

Når en ingrediens ændres, kan menukortet kræve rettelser, selv om opskriftsdatoen står stille. Sådan kan AI hjælpe med gennemgang og godkendelse i WordPress.

Når checkout fejler, skal driftspartneren have noget konkret at arbejde med. Se, hvordan AI, dmesg og journalctl kan samle sporene i en brugbar driftssag.

Brug oktober til at afprøve daglige AI-forslag til genbestilling før Black Friday. Få styr på Shopify-data, leveringstid og budget, før forslagene bliver til indkøb.

Jeg lærte serverdrift ved at ødelægge mine egne servere. Jeg søger en, der vil stå ved siden af mig, mens jeg gør det, og så gøre det selv ugen efter.

Jeg er god til at bygge og dårlig til at ringe. Her er, hvem jeg vil have ved siden af mig, hvad der er lettest at sælge, og hvordan vi deler det.

AI kan samle onboardingopgaverne før første arbejdsdag. Se, hvordan lederen godkender konkret adgang, og hvordan åbne opgaver bliver fulgt til dørs.

En AI-assistent kan svare på spørgsmål og føre kunder til booking. Her er de konkrete grænser for pris, levering, personoplysninger og kontakt med en medarbejder.

Et sikkert AI-workflow kan omsætte Meet- og Teams-transskripter til godkendte beslutninger og opgaver i Jira eller Asana – uden at slippe kontrollen.

AI kan finde opsigelsesfrister og prisreguleringer i leverandørkontrakter, sende usikre fund til godkendelse og oprette de rette påmindelser.